Flying Vs. Driving

RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by MissMakeDo (2) | (12/12/2006) Contact For reasons already listed and many other, do drive. We traveled nearly a week by car when our son was little. In more recent years we travel with our other "kids"...two dogs. Not much difference than traveling with real children. They have the back seat and we have the front. They each have a window, blanket, etc. We stop at rest stops and after business is done we walk the pups (on leashes). They get fresh water and a treat and are ready to ride again. We've made many memories and taken priceless pictures traveling this way. Time is time and can be spent together with familiar things around you or waiting in a terminal to see when/if you'll be leaving and wondering if your things will arrive with you. Granny RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by kimmcg (132) | (12/11/2006) Contact We flew from NJ to Missouri last year (myself and my 13 yr old son and 10 yr old daughter) and it was an ALL DAY ORDEAL. From the time we left home, until the time we got to my friends house it was about 14 hrs anyway. You have to get there 2 hours before the flight,park, we had to walk forever to get from one gait to the next, plus go through all the security, check in your luggage, then they have to GO THROUGH all your luggage, then there may be delays, layovers, etc. Then when you arrive you have to wait for your luggage (thats IF it doesnt get LOST) Then you still have to drive from the airport to wherever it is you are visiting anyhow. I say drive. If I were alone, I would fly, but not with kids. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By (Guest Post) (12/10/2006) FLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I drove and had a baby screaming for 10 hours (yes, two of us in the car) and it was a nightmare! Then, a month later I flew by myself and he nursed/slept the whole way --- the key was keeping him a wake until the flight. yes, he was cranky but he fell alseep almost 1/3 hour into the flight after nursing. I truly believe holding him was the key and having him eating during takeoff and landing. You can have someone buy the diapers, food, any of your personal items at the place you are going and they will be more than happy to find the playpen and anything else you need (ask the nursey at church and the people that work there) as they will be so glad to see you and the baby. If you truly can't live without your stuff, mail it -- I did that and it was cheaper than paying all the extra fees with the luggage. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Doggy (Guest Post) (12/10/2006) There's NO way I'd take a 6 week old infant on a plane. Their little ears are way too vulnerable. Plan on 7 hr. days, stay over mid-way. Stay safe, alert and happy. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Poco (Guest Post) (12/10/2006) I would drive. This summer I decided to fly instead of driving 450 miles, what a mistake, with airline delays etc. I would have been home sooner had I driven. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By (Guest Post) (12/10/2006) following new safety advice about infant cars seats i would say driving is less hassle BUT make sure you let the baby out of the infant car seat to straighten out and stretch her legs every hour or so for breathing and circulation and then continue driving carol RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Amy (Guest Post) (12/09/2006) From a Mom with 2 active toddlers: drive. You will be so glad to have all the stuff and the baby will sleep most of the way--assuming you have a non-colicky infant. We usually put one parent in the back with the kid(s). After the baby starts to turn over and crawl, etc., you won't be able to do this so easily! RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Linda from Las Vegas.Nv (Guest Post) (12/09/2006) I would definitely drive. There is a God's beautiful country out there to admire and appreciate. Take time to smell the roses, so to speak. Enjoy the times with your child along the way. Stop at a hotel and eat in the room, very relaxing. I travel with my dog, also. We had a blast and saw some beautiful places. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By sfrench1124@hotmail.com (Guest Post) (12/09/2006) I, myself, would drive. You can make sure you stop in all states, or points of interest, take five minutes to take a photo of your child, you and your child, your child and spouse, etc. Make a scrapbook page and place in your baby book. It isn't that difficult to travel w/a baby, they sleep for hours anyway, right? You can save money this way, too. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by tedsmom (221) | (12/09/2006) Contact This would be a no-brainer for me! I'd choose flying for 2 hours over driving for 14 hours any day! From my experience (not personal but observation), the stewards are very good at helping deal with children on flights. I flew to Ireland one year (11 hours) on a plane with a couple who had 3 small children, and they didn't have a bit of trouble. As far as safety is concerned, statistically, fewer people die in airplanes than in automobiles annually! RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by GrammySheila (22) | (12/09/2006) Contact Stephanie, I say drive, too. As the grandmother of 9, 5, and 1 year old girls I know the amount of "stuff" required to travel with a baby. There is no way in the world I would attempt to fly with a 6 week old...for all the reasons already listed, plus weather delays in an airport with an infant. At least if you are driving and run into bad weather, you can get a motel room until things clear up if need be. Whatever YOU choose...be safe and have a Blessed CHRISTmas!!! RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by susanmajp (295) | (12/09/2006) Contact When my son was young, we made several trips that were over 1000 miles, and we always drove. Forget all the horror stories you hear, he was good as gold, slept a lot. When he was up, I often sat next to him while my husband drove, to read books or play with him. I'd buy a few new small toys to keep him occupied as he got older, but as an infant, he slept on the trips. One tip I'd give, is to make sure someone can watch her when you arrive, cause she'll be wide awake and you'll be ready for a nap. Don't let anyone fool you, flying with a baby can be a major problem. It's hard to carry everything you need with you, it's not as easy to deal with feedings and diapers on a plane, other passengers quickly get annoyed and angry, and to be safe, you must buy another ticket for a seat to strap the baby-seat into. Do not attempt to hold your infant on the trip. I've seen planes hit turbulence and babies go flying out of their parent's arms, several rows up the aisles, only to land and get hurt. And you must remember all the time you'll spend waiting in the terminal before and for bags after the flight. Either way, making a trip with an infant can be stressful. Hope all goes well for you. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Jenny (Guest Post) (12/09/2006) With a very young baby, I would really consider not traveling by plane, because she will be exposed to so many viruses. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by Ainsco (2) | (12/08/2006) Blog! | Contact You might not fly often enough to remember how painful it is on the ears sometimes. The last flight I took was to Amsterdam and took 9 hours. The whole flight was upset over an infant screaming most of the time. Poor thing its mom was crying almost as hard. Enjoy the drive I say. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by jowhit67 (12) | (12/08/2006) Contact If it were me, I'd fly. A 14 hour road trip with a baby that has to be fed, diapered, etc. means frequent stops (can't do those things while she's buckled in a car seat!) and can easily turn into much longer than that. Safest? Well...the chances of somehting happening in 2 hours vs. 14+....I'd say the shortest time would have the better odds. RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post by sjackie2000 (64) | (12/08/2006) Profile | Contact Hi Stephanie, I'm also traveling for Christmas this year. I'm driving 970 miles by myself. I've checked flights, and it's cheaper for me to drive than to fly. You have to consider the amount of luggage you'll be taking, plus gifts. My car will be packed, but it would cost me extra to fly everything that I'm taking with me. It's really a matter of choice and cost. If you can afford to fly, then I would go that way. But I can't afford it, so that's why I'm driving. I also do most of my driving at night because there is less traffic on the road so it's safer. Whatever you decide, have a Merry Christmas and a safe New Year! RE: Flying Vs. Driving Post By Peggy (Guest Post) (12/08/2006) I personally don't like to fly. I am a large person, and I am so uncomfortable squashed up in the seats and there is just no leg room. I recently drove from Texas to California to see my family, it is over 700 miles each way. Yes, the drive is long, but to me it is worth it. I can bring anything I want for my kids, and I have the advantage of having my own car if I want to get away from everyone for awhile. I hope you have a good trip, whatever you decide.